Talk:Mac iCar
This is the talk page for the article Mac iCar. Below is a conversational space for discussing the aforementioned article—not the subject itself. If you are looking to do so, check out our forums or official Discord server. | ![]() |
To open a talk page proposal, follow the instructions here. Please be civil and be sure to sign your comments with [[User:Your name here|]], {{user|Your name here}} or ~~~~. |
Fix name
You should really change the name to the correct one of Mac iCar, as it was changed early on in development. Please see all other wikis. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 22:53, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
- I will. RodRedlineM1 (talk) 00:12, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
Appearance in Cars 3?
Okay, the whole "Mac iCar is in Cars 3" thing is getting out of hand. Has a die-cast of Mac iCar in a different shape compared to his shape in the first film even been officially released around the release of the third film? Because if not, then the page shouldn't even mention that he appears in Cars 3. --Lightening McQueen (talk) 22:59, April 9, 2019 (UTC)
It's not the same character. For example, the Rev-N-Go Racer of Misti Motorkrass, which inherited the Crown Celesta brand, is Axxelo Fission, and the Apple Racer is also Axxelo Fission.
If the Mac iCar returns and continues to participate in the 2016 competition after episodes 1 to 3, then he should volunteer to be rebuilt into the Capitol Motors Mark II like other cars, rather than maintaining the original Axxelo Fission
Like Darren Leadfoot, Dirkson D'Agostino, Ernie Gearson, Ponchy Wipeout, Todd Marcus, Floyd Mulvihill, Murray Clutchburn and Ralph Carlow ane the same
Although Derksen D'Agostino was in Capitol Motors in Episode 1, he was a Capitol Motors Verve XT at that time. After Episode 3, he was also changed to Capitol Motors Mark II like other returning racers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lin Junting (talk • contribs)
- Do the racers in the film (or die-casts, however this is drawn) not all share the same model, visually speaking? I've heard this observation before but have struggled to understand how the Apple conclusion can definitively be made. There's a pattern among the info we do have, sure, but the very fact there's room for exception inherently prevents its infallibility. ~~ RodRedlineM1 (talk)
08:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC) 08:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)